Medical Device SecurityResearchNortheastern · under Prof. Kevin Fu & Axel Wirth

Finding, Scoring, and Disclosing a Vulnerability in a Clinical Device

Aug 7, 20261 min readmedical devices, threat modelling, cvss, coordinated disclosure

About this writeup

This handbook comes out of my graduate research on a large-volume infusion pump, done under the supervision of Prof. Kevin Fu and Axel Wirth. The pump is still in clinical use, so this document deliberately contains no reproduction details: no credentials, no interface paths, no firmware procedures. Those details live in the coordinated disclosure package held with the manufacturer.

What it does contain is the part that carries over to other devices: how to think about a clinical device, how to model its threats, how to score a finding, and how to decide what to publish.

It covers:

  • The clinical context: why a medical device is not an IT asset
  • Threat modelling: STRIDE, data flow diagrams, and trust boundaries when patient harm is the impact axis
  • Risk analysis: why CVSS mis-ranks medical findings, and how to score so the number means something
  • The regulatory frame: what the manufacturer is obliged to do
  • Coordinated disclosure: the process, who to contact, CVE assignment, and the legal and ethical footing
  • Research conduct: lab safety, device sourcing, and keeping a research record that holds up
  • Templates: threat model, disclosure report, and risk register
  • The decision register: every judgement call in one place

Read it below, or download the PDF. The project overview is on the case study page.

Methodology & Disclosure Handbook

Found this useful?
Twitter LinkedIn
PreviousThe NeuSense Hardware Security Module — MITRE eCTF 2026